L anglaise et le duc online dating

L anglaise et le duc online dating

As for Orleans he is often

We see her acting and moving around, but the other characters also live in a very powerful way, especially the Duke of Orleans, of whom we have very few first-hand reports. Seeing Orphans of the Storm again, I realized that most of the time, its strength is that each shot is static. My directing of actors, as usual, went no further than giving them technical instructions. We had to know how the characters would fit into the scenery, so we filmed a test with extras going through a doorway and it worked. To me, this work was not just a matter of being meticulous it was about striving for an authenticity that underpins the whole film.

We worked from pictures and engravings, but also from street maps of the period. You were also interested in the light the characters shed on the events of the Revolution.

As for Orleans, he is often shown in a totally negative light, but there is a mystery, an ambiguity, a duality about him that interests me. So I had the idea of inserting real-life characters into scenic backgrounds that I would have specially painted, based on the layout of the city at that time. What interests me is their lack of fanaticism.

Perhaps this is how it happens when History overturns the lives of individuals. Feelings are the actor's business. And I do think that resorting to a highly visible artifice gives me truth. It was a constraint, of course. She doesn't want to leave France.

So I had

Few other historical characters have ever seemed so close to us, and so moving. Grace stands up for the King but she is not an extremist. If anyone wants to pass judgment on historical grounds, they should judge the book on which the film was based, not the film itself. So I took static shots, and closer shots with a second camera.

Yes, and I had to find a way of depicting historical Paris. The article mentioned that her town house was still standing at such-and-such a number on Rue Miromesnil. There is a huge potential interest in history in France, but period films have often been rather lax about historical exactitude. It was the trend then, rather as it is the trend nowadays to claim to be an environmentalist. Inserting characters into sets is one of the oldest tricks in the filmmaker's book.

In this film, I depict the Revolution as people would have seen it at the time. She is probably actually less of a royalist than she says, given that she wrote her book in anti-Revolutionary England.

While on holiday about ten years ago, I came across a digest of the memoirs of Grace Elliott in a history magazine. And I try to make the characters more like the reality you find in paintings. The interiors are not real locations.

As for Jean-Claude Dreyfus, I didn't think of him at first, but I was looking for a strong personality. She has Republican friends such as Orleans and Biron. Memoir-writers mostly tend to write about themselves, their fears and hopes, but Grace Elliott includes herself in the picture, though always maintaining a certain detachment and distance. All I did was tell them to enunciate clearly so that they would be understood. You could say I'm faithful to Bazin's teachings, even if he was too hidebound regarding depth of field and the sequence shot.

What interests me is

The audience might be inclined to condemn the killing of the King, as Grace does. One is also reminded of your work in educational television. All three films are admirable for different reasons. Truth comes from the painting, not the editing.

That wouldn't have interested me. They were painted by Jean-Baptiste Marot.

My researcher found me a complete copy of the text, which had been published several times in France. Even though I've sometimes been compared to Marivaux, it isn't my favourite century.